<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 011: Fair Use!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rulesfortherevolution.com/2007/04/20/episode-011-fair-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rulesfortherevolution.com/2007/04/20/episode-011-fair-use/</link>
	<description>Answering your questions about podcasting, new media and the law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:15:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: this is how you don&#8217;t get sued when borrowing material &#171; Cobblertothestars&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.rulesfortherevolution.com/2007/04/20/episode-011-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-6956</link>
		<dc:creator>this is how you don&#8217;t get sued when borrowing material &#171; Cobblertothestars&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rulesfortherevolution.com/2007/04/20/episode-011-fair-use/#comment-6956</guid>
		<description>[...] October 1, 2008 at 7:46 pm &#183; Filed under Uncategorized   I just listened to a podcast called Rules for the Revolution produced by Collette Vogel, episode 11.  She reminds me of every boy&#8217;s dream: mannerisms of a cheerleeder, intellegence of an attorney, (which she is) and the tenacity of an activist.  Her guest was Tony Falzone, head of the Stanford Fair Use Project.  Fair use refers to exceptions in copyright law.  Falzone was eloquent in his explaination of the topic, and divided the issue into 4 factors.  The first factor to consider when deciding to use another&#8217;s work in your own is: did you change it?  The courts often look at wether or not the finished product has been transformed, and to what degree.  The second factor is: where did the original material come from?  If it is an historical record, or not copyrighted material, then end of story, its free to use.  The third factor to consider is: the amount of original material that you are using.  If you made a short film, and used the first 20 minutes of the soundtrack to The Little Mermaid, you would be in violation of copyright law.  And even if you only use a little bit of the soundtrack to that film, it had better not be the part that sings, &#8220;under the sea&#8221; - its most recognizeable lyric.  That is called by Falzone as the &#8220;heart of the material&#8221; (he actually used a scenario that cited the review of a book in which the review was a &#8217;spoiler&#8217;).  The fourth factor has to do with the effect on the market that the new material has.  If sales of the original are threatened by the new material, then don&#8217;t do it.  You will be sued.  Most of the factors are matters of opinion to an extent, so be careful either way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 1, 2008 at 7:46 pm &#183; Filed under Uncategorized   I just listened to a podcast called Rules for the Revolution produced by Collette Vogel, episode 11.  She reminds me of every boy&#8217;s dream: mannerisms of a cheerleeder, intellegence of an attorney, (which she is) and the tenacity of an activist.  Her guest was Tony Falzone, head of the Stanford Fair Use Project.  Fair use refers to exceptions in copyright law.  Falzone was eloquent in his explaination of the topic, and divided the issue into 4 factors.  The first factor to consider when deciding to use another&#8217;s work in your own is: did you change it?  The courts often look at wether or not the finished product has been transformed, and to what degree.  The second factor is: where did the original material come from?  If it is an historical record, or not copyrighted material, then end of story, its free to use.  The third factor to consider is: the amount of original material that you are using.  If you made a short film, and used the first 20 minutes of the soundtrack to The Little Mermaid, you would be in violation of copyright law.  And even if you only use a little bit of the soundtrack to that film, it had better not be the part that sings, &#8220;under the sea&#8221; &#8211; its most recognizeable lyric.  That is called by Falzone as the &#8220;heart of the material&#8221; (he actually used a scenario that cited the review of a book in which the review was a &#8217;spoiler&#8217;).  The fourth factor has to do with the effect on the market that the new material has.  If sales of the original are threatened by the new material, then don&#8217;t do it.  You will be sued.  Most of the factors are matters of opinion to an extent, so be careful either way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legally Content &#187; Legally Content 1.8 - Fair use as a guide for the application of fair dealing</title>
		<link>http://www.rulesfortherevolution.com/2007/04/20/episode-011-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Legally Content &#187; Legally Content 1.8 - Fair use as a guide for the application of fair dealing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rulesfortherevolution.com/2007/04/20/episode-011-fair-use/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>[...] I spoke a bit about fair dealing in South African law in episode 1.6 and in this episode I present a discussion between Colette Vogele and Tony Falzone about Fair Use in an episode of Rules for the Revolution which was published under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. This discussion is published under the same Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License notwithstanding Legally Content&#8217;s own Creative Commons license. I recommend that you visit Colette&#8217;s post on Rules for the Revolution for her show notes and that you subscribe to Rules for the Revolution which is a fantastic legal podcast focussed on American intellectual property law. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I spoke a bit about fair dealing in South African law in episode 1.6 and in this episode I present a discussion between Colette Vogele and Tony Falzone about Fair Use in an episode of Rules for the Revolution which was published under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. This discussion is published under the same Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License notwithstanding Legally Content&#8217;s own Creative Commons license. I recommend that you visit Colette&#8217;s post on Rules for the Revolution for her show notes and that you subscribe to Rules for the Revolution which is a fantastic legal podcast focussed on American intellectual property law. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rules for the Revolution &#171; Tombrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.rulesfortherevolution.com/2007/04/20/episode-011-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Rules for the Revolution &#171; Tombrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rulesfortherevolution.com/2007/04/20/episode-011-fair-use/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>[...] As of April 2007, she has 12 episodes. I just listened to episode 12 which is about Promonet, a site which legally provides music for podcasts and other web applications. As was the case with this episode, she has guests on her podcasts, so it&#8217;s more of a lively interview format rather than just someone pontificating about copyright laws. Some of the issues she&#8217;s covered in previous episodes include: fair use, section 230 of the CDA, and DMCA. Must listening for librarians. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As of April 2007, she has 12 episodes. I just listened to episode 12 which is about Promonet, a site which legally provides music for podcasts and other web applications. As was the case with this episode, she has guests on her podcasts, so it&#8217;s more of a lively interview format rather than just someone pontificating about copyright laws. Some of the issues she&#8217;s covered in previous episodes include: fair use, section 230 of the CDA, and DMCA. Must listening for librarians. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
